<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>new jersey geographer &#187; FOIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://njgeo.org/tag/foia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://njgeo.org</link>
	<description>GIS and planning in New Jersey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Equality in Data: Should personal addresses be redacted?</title>
		<link>http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/</link>
		<comments>http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mecklenburg County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://njgeo.org/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because you have a hammer doesn't mean you're going to start hitting people with it. Intentionally crippling a web service and reducing accessibility should always be seen as a major step backwards. <a href="http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_244" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://njgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/johnsmith.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-244" title="johnsmith" src="http://njgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/johnsmith-150x150.png" alt="The property of a randomly chosen &quot;John Smith&quot;" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The property of a randomly chosen &quot;John Smith&quot;</p></div>
<p>Mecklenburg County (Charlotte), North Carolina is currently facing an information-sharing predicament. <a href="http://polaris.mecklenburgcountync.gov/">POLARIS</a>, their county-wide interactive web map, currently serves up property ownership information as part of the real property and tax records in the county databases. The county is looking <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/real_estate/2010/02/county_looks_at_name_dropping.html">to remove the ability to search by owner to locate land records</a>, mainly because the police are concerned that criminals may use the system to target officers&#8217; homes. I appreciate the concern for the safety of the police force, however theoretically anyone could target anyone else using public records. Just because you have a hammer doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re going to start hitting people with it. Intentionally crippling a web service and reducing accessibility should always be seen as a major step backwards.(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/">Equality in Data: Should personal addresses be redacted?</a> on my blog. </p>
<hr />
<p><small>© John Reiser for <a href="http://njgeo.org">new jersey geographer</a>, 2010. |
<a href="http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/#comments">No comment</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/&title=Equality in Data: Should personal addresses be redacted?">del.icio.us</a>
<br/>
Post tags: <a href="http://njgeo.org/tag/foia/" rel="tag">FOIA</a>, <a href="http://njgeo.org/tag/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://njgeo.org/tag/mecklenburg-county/" rel="tag">Mecklenburg County</a>, <a href="http://njgeo.org/tag/north-carolina/" rel="tag">North Carolina</a>, <a href="http://njgeo.org/tag/opra/" rel="tag">opra</a>, <a href="http://njgeo.org/tag/privacy/" rel="tag">Privacy</a><br/>
</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://njgeo.org/2010/02/19/equality-in-data-should-personal-addresses-be-redacted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

