<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GIS and the expectation of privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://njgeo.org/2008/07/31/gis-and-the-expectation-of-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://njgeo.org/2008/07/31/gis-and-the-expectation-of-privacy/</link>
	<description>GIS and planning in New Jersey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://njgeo.org/2008/07/31/gis-and-the-expectation-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://njgeo.org/?p=13#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I completely forgot about that! I agree with part of that sentiment; just because it&#039;s now accessible doesn&#039;t mean it becomes invasive. If Google started cataloging faces and matching it up to Picasa accounts for secret &quot;research purposes,&quot; I&#039;d be concerned. Isolated data is not that dangerous, it&#039;s the unregulated corporations that maintain huge databases of personal data, cross referencing it with sensitive data like credit cards. It&#039;s horrible when TJ Maxx loses thousands of credit card numbers, just imagine someone getting a hold of a DB with CCs along with recent purchases, browsing habits, pictures of family, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely forgot about that! I agree with part of that sentiment; just because it&#8217;s now accessible doesn&#8217;t mean it becomes invasive. If Google started cataloging faces and matching it up to Picasa accounts for secret &#8220;research purposes,&#8221; I&#8217;d be concerned. Isolated data is not that dangerous, it&#8217;s the unregulated corporations that maintain huge databases of personal data, cross referencing it with sensitive data like credit cards. It&#8217;s horrible when TJ Maxx loses thousands of credit card numbers, just imagine someone getting a hold of a DB with CCs along with recent purchases, browsing habits, pictures of family, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aentchev</title>
		<link>http://njgeo.org/2008/07/31/gis-and-the-expectation-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>aentchev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://njgeo.org/?p=13#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&quot;You have zero privacy anyway,&quot; Scott McNealy told a group of reporters and analysts Monday night [January 26, 1999] at an event to launch his company&#039;s new Jini technology.

&quot;Get over it.&quot;

http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have zero privacy anyway,&#8221; Scott McNealy told a group of reporters and analysts Monday night [January 26, 1999] at an event to launch his company&#8217;s new Jini technology.</p>
<p>&#8220;Get over it.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

